Small businesses are the lifeblood of our economy. All of us, at some point during our daily grind, interact with a small-business owner in some way — mainly through service industries. In Los Angeles County, where Latinos make up nearly half the population, nearly a quarter of all working Latinos are employed in service occupations.
Any disruption to small business reaches far and not only impacts many thousands of owners and employees, but the communities they serve as well. Unfortunately, such a disruption is looming over Los Angeles. The city will begin to debate the fate of the local vacation-home rental industry — and with it the thousands of small-business owners and employees who rely on it for their livelihoods.
Late last year, the primary-only, short-term rental ordinance was passed with new regulations set to take effect July 1 of this year. That ordinance completely excludes secondary, whole-home vacation home rentals and threatens to negatively impact not only the thousands of owners who dutifully pay taxes to the City of Los Angeles and whose homes drive local tourism, but also the many ancillary groups that depend on the vacation-home rental industry for their livelihoods. Maintenance workers, gardeners and landscapers, the house cleaners and the small businesses that enjoy local tourist dollars will all be impacted without an ordinance that responsibly regulates the vacation-home rental industry.
The groups standing against a comprehensive policy to regulate the vacation-home rental industry claim short-term rentals are a root cause of the affordable housing crisis in Los Angeles. The truth is that whole-home vacation rentals make up a small fraction of the local housing market — less than 1% — but have a long history of creating economic opportunity for local residents and small-business owners, particularly in the service industry sector. No data supports the claim that short-term rentals are causing affordable housing issues in the city.
Local owners should be allowed to rent their property — regardless of whether it’s their primary or secondary residence. The city is charged with crafting a solution that balances the needs of all sides to ensure consumer choice and prosperity for local residents and small businesses. Los Angeles voters agree — a recent poll conducted by Fairbank Maslin Maullin Metz and Associates, and commissioned by the Los Angeles Vacation Home Rental Association — found overwhelming support for vacation rentals from Angelenos across all demographics. A vast majority of voters believe it is important to allow homeowners to rent their properties as whole-home vacation rentals and are opposed to any type of ban on traditional vacation home rentals.
Moreover, 81% of voters understand that whole-home vacation rentals are important to the local economy and tourism industry. They understand the role vacation rentals play in their neighborhoods, and expect their elected representatives to step up and deliver an ordinance that responsibly regulates the vacation-home rental industry.
The L.A. City Council’s Planning and Land Use Management Committee has a great opportunity to bring the entire vacation-home rental industry under the umbrella of short-term regulation. Many homeowners I’ve spoken to and heard stories from want to be part of the city’s policy to regulate short-term rentals. Homeowners are not running away from this policy and only want to be part of the greater plan to increase accountability from short-term renters and have clear guidelines on how to conduct business in Los Angeles.
Julian Canete is chief executive and president of the California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce, which represents the business interests of more than 800,000 Hispanic-owned businesses.
For reprint and licensing requests for this article, CLICK HERE.