Hanjin’s Empties Pile Up Despite Slowdown in Long Beach

0
Hanjin’s Empties Pile Up Despite Slowdown in Long Beach
Hanjin Shipping containers stacked up at the Port of Long Beach.

From empty containers piling up to a drastic drop in cargo numbers, the impact of Hanjin Shipping Co.’s bankruptcy filing this summer has continued to frustrate local businesses.

Last week, as port officials and trucking companies tried to address thousands of Hanjin containers stacking up, the Port of Long Beach announced that September container volume declined 16.6 percent year over year after the Aug. 31 bankruptcy filing.

However, the fate of what had been the world’s seventh-largest cargo carrier and its effect on local shipping operations could soon be resolved. A South Korean court last week said it would sell off Hanjin’s major assets, including its Asia-to-United States network.

While that could reboot last month’s lackluster cargo movement and resolve issues surrounding homeless containers, it could also mean a new owner for Long Beach’s largest port terminal. Hanjin owns the biggest share of Total Terminals International, which operates Pier T – through which one-third of the port’s cargo passes.

Before the court’s ruling, Noel Hacegaba, chief commercial officer at the Port of Long Beach, said it was still business as usual.

“At the moment, the operation at TTI continues,” Hacegaba said last week. “They’re current on their bills.”

Hanjin has been a key player in the local shipping industry. Last year, it was the third-largest cargo carrier at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, handling 5.3 percent of their combined 15.4 million containers, according to numbers from shipping data company Piers and the ports’ cargo reports.

Cargo in limbo

Many L.A.-area companies rely on Hanjin to deliver goods manufactured in Asia, and as soon as one Hanjin-related problem has been resolved, another seems to take its place.

Sinking under the weight of $5.4 billion in debt, Hanjin-owned ships around the world were forced to drop anchor and wait, lacking the cash to pay docking fees or to unload cargo many U.S. retailers were waiting for. That included three ships bound for Long Beach that waited for a couple of weeks until the company got a cash infusion to allow its ships to deliver the goods.

The relief was short-lived, however, because once the cargo containers were unloaded and returned to local ports, trucking companies discovered there was nowhere to put them. Hanjin was no longer sending empty containers back to Asia.

At the beginning of last week, about 8,700 Hanjin-owned and -leased containers were “out on the streets of Southern California,” said Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles.

That created another problem: Most of those containers were on a truck chassis, reducing the number available for both ports from the usual 73,000, which meant cargo from other carriers also was getting backed up.

“Cargo is moving a little slower because chassis aren’t as available as we’d like,” Seroka said.

Hanjin later announced it would take some empty containers, freeing up chassis, at Pier T.

Stephen Ferguson, Long Beach equipment control senior coordinator at Hanjin Shipping in Chandler, Ariz., said the site would take up to 200 containers a shift over four days beginning Oct. 12, for up to 1,600 containers.

That would be a relief for freight-forwarding and customs broker companies such as Carson’s Krieger Worldwide, which handles about 1,000 client containers a month at local ports.

First, said Robert Krieger, the firm’s president, “The amount of work to get cargo off of the Hanjin vessels was horrendous.”

Now, pickup times for containers have doubled to about three days from ship to truck, he said.

“We can’t tell exactly if there is one cause, but part of it might be the chassis are getting a little tight,” he said.

The flow of Hanjin containers should end soon, at least until its assets are purchased, with the final company-operated ship expected to arrive in Long Beach on Sunday, according to the Marine Exchange of Southern California.

No posts to display