I totally get how taxi companies and taxi drivers despise Uber, Lyft and the other ridesharing companies.

After all, taxi drivers typically must meet training, licensing and other vetting standards while ridesharing drivers are largely excused from all that, other than passing a criminal background check and having the right insurance and a nice car.

Taxi companies are regulated and the cabs typically are inspected on a schedule. In many cities, each cab must have a permit, typically called a medallion or a badge, which can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars each – they once hit $1 million in New York. That cost gets passed on, of course, and as a result a taxi driver might have to pay the cab company $100 to rent the cab for the day. Ridesharing companies? They don’t need no stinking badges.

So taxi companies and their drivers are vexed by the notion that Uber, Lyft and their automotive brethren, which aren’t subject to the same costs and obligations as regular taxis, could soon be allowed to pick up passengers at Los Angeles International Airport. Taxi folks see LAX as their last bastion; it’s their biggest source of reliably good fares and the only place where ridesharing companies are now banned. Take that away and, well, maybe the deluge follows.

I understand their outrage. The whole situation just isn’t fair. But still, that’s not a good enough reason to prevent ridesharing companies from picking up passengers at LAX. Consumers have voted with their pocketbooks. They like ridesharing services.

No, it isn’t fair that taxis are saddled with costs and regulations that Uber, Lyft and the others get to skip. But here’s the problem for the taxi folks: This is business. And business isn’t fair. It’s not supposed to be. The business that figures how to deliver a product or service that’s better, faster or cheaper tends to win, fairness be damned.

The taxi business is in the same situation today that most every other industry has found itself in, or will someday. A few years ago, sit-down restaurants complained that they were being decimated by food trucks that showed up at lunch and dinner time – sometimes at a restaurant’s doorstep. It wasn’t fair, they said, because the trucks didn’t have to pay rent or utilities and they could drive to wherever the customers were at any given moment, allowing the trucks to charge less. The trucks essentially said, “Yeah, that’s the point.”


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, CLICK HERE.