Because New.net does not own the domain names it sells, there is nothing to prevent other companies from signing people up on those extensions, potentially with the same names sold by New.net.
"The bottom line is the Internet is just like the telephone system. You need to have unique identifiers to make it work," said Andrew McLaughlin, chief policy officer for ICANN, who is critical of New.net and other services that he believes risk making the Internet unwieldy.
"So far, all these efforts like New.net have failed because people want the Internet domain system to be administered in the public interest," McLaughlin said.
Hernand acknowledged that other companies could register the same extensions, and perhaps even the same names, but he said those names would be worthless because few people would be able to access them. New.net's deals with EarthLink and the other ISPs means only names registered by New.net will be accessible through those systems.
John Irwin, executive vice president of customer experience for EarthLink, which is carrying New.net's extensions on a one-year trial basis, said the company is less interested in the political implications of using alternative extensions than in ensuring its users get what they want.
EarthLink will decide whether to renew its agreement with New.net in early 2002, he said.
For reprint and licensing requests for this article, CLICK HERE.
Stories You May Also Be Interested In
- DOTTV --- Firms Paying Up to Go Live on DotTV
- Demand Approved as Registrar for Top-Level Domains
- Cybersense---Domain Registry Group Lacks Authority, Leadership
- DOT-KIDS---Company Seeks Kid-Friendly Domains
- Cybersense---Internet Name Group Needs a Lesson in Democracy
- DOT-COM---Suit Says Dot-Biz Registry is Illegal Lottery
- Cybersense --- Managing the Mad Rush for Brand New Net Domains
- Calling Names Can Lead to Costly Online Battles