With the mayor's race over, the jockeying begins in another contest for a top L.A. City Hall post: the presidency of the City Council.
Current council president Alex Padilla is looking for his third two-year term, but he is being challenged by Hollywood area Councilman Eric Garcetti.
A council president can have significant influence in shaping the chamber's agenda. That includes appointing councilmembers to committees, being acting mayor when the mayor is out of town (as Padilla did when James Hahn was stranded in Washington after the terrorist attacks), and making commission appointments if the mayor doesn't fill them after a certain period of time.
Padilla has said privately that he has eight votes necessary to secure a majority of the 15-member council. However, Garcetti supporters say their man can peel off a couple of those to get to eight himself.
Those supporters note residual bad feeling on how Padilla presided over the bitter debate on whether to place on the ballot a half-cent sales tax hike for additional cops. Padilla sided with Antonio Villaraigosa, Greig Smith, Jack Weiss and Dennis Zine against the proposal, which needed 10 votes to pass.
Last week's elections add more uncertainty, given that Villaraigosa will be off the council when the vote occurs this summer. That means whoever wins the presidency must get the support of seven of the remaining 13 councilmembers, instead of 7 out of 14 members, leaving less wriggle-room.
Then there's the election of former cable television executive and talk show host Bill Rosendahl to the council. Garcetti supported Rosendahl in the council race, but Padilla supported Rosendahl's opponent, Flora Gil Krisiloff. The expectation is that Rosendahl would initially side with Garcetti.
The focus will be on locking up swing votes, including Janice Hahn, Jan Perry, Jack Weiss and possibly Bernard Parks. (Parks proved to be the swing vote two years ago when he sided with Padilla against Wendy Greuel.)
Here is where the jockeying will be most intense. In exchange for their votes, councilmembers seek key committee assignments. Parks, for example, received the chairmanship of the powerful budget committee in exchange for his vote for Padilla.
Another question is where labor will side. As a self-described progressive, Garcetti has frequently aligned himself with labor and is now pushing for passage of a labor-backed ordinance that requires developers to set aside housing units as affordable. Padilla, though, has been a reliable supporter of public employee unions on contracts.
There's also the question of which councilmember's bid mayor-elect Villaraigosa will support, if any. While he won't have a direct vote, Villaraigosa can indicate who he would rather work with as council president.
Sparring Over Bay Bridge
Who should pay for the mounting construction costs of a new San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge is turning into a North-South war that has split both the legislative leadership and the state's business community.
Reconstruction of the two-mile long Bay Bridge, which was severely damaged in the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, has climbed from $1 billion in the early 1990s to $6.5 billion, thanks to numerous delays and design changes. The small portion of the new bridge that has been built is now being examined for possible faulty welds.
Now, just as higher-than-expected revenues are giving a boost to transportation funding, there are bitter exchanges over the bridge reconstruction. State Sen. President-pro-tempore Don Perata, D-Oakland, has proposed a $7.7 billion transportation bond for the June 2006 ballot, with $1.4 billion earmarked for Bay Bridge reconstruction. Assembly Speaker Fabian Nu & #324;ez, D-Los Angeles, has put forward his own $10 billion transportation bond proposal for the same ballot, but with no funds specifically earmarked for the Bay Bridge. Nu & #324;ez said he would do whatever it takes to make sure that L.A. taxpayers don't foot the bill for the Bay Bridge, so that money would be available for road projects in Southern California.
Meanwhile, a war of words is escalating between the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce and its northern counterpart, the Bay Area Council. In a letter distributed to L.A. area papers, Bay Area Council president Jim Wunderman accused the L.A. chamber of starting a new North-South war. L.A. Area Chamber president and chief executive Rusty Hammer last week called the Perata transportation bond a clever cover for a statewide bond measure to fund the Bay Bridge reconstruction.
*Staff reporter Howard Fine can be reached by phone at (323) 549-5225, ext. 227, or by e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org .
For reprint and licensing requests for this article, CLICK HERE.
Stories You May Also Be Interested In
- Garcetti Drops Bid for Council Presidency
- Delgadillo Digs Up Sunshine Landfill Extension
- Padilla Hasn't Found the Time To Focus on L.A. Mayor's Race
- Villaraigosa, Hahn Headed to Rematch
- Padilla Sets City Council Committees
- Update: L.A. City Council Votes Against Tax to Fund More Cops
- Business Leaders Pick Up Tab for Villaraigosa's Inaugural
- Sales Tax Proposal to Fund LAPD Hires Fails to Make Ballot