Does the truck stop here?
That’s the question being asked about Assembly Bill 5 by the trucking companies that ferry billions of dollars of goods to and from Southern California ports.
The trucking industry is one of dozens bracing for potential changes from the so-called gig worker rule, which could upend freelance work throughout California.
For now, many trucking businesses have no plans to change their contractors to employees, preferring instead to see what happens in the courts and at the ballot box.
AB5, which was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom Sept. 18 and is set to take hold Jan. 1, redefines what it means to be an employee in California by mandating that certain contract workers be classified as employees.
Workers such as software engineers, musicians, video game developers and other professionals are grappling with how these changes will reshape their respective industries’ business models. But nowhere has this issue played out longer than it has with truckers.
“We have been dealing with this issue for a long time,” said Joe Rajkovacz, director of governmental affairs and communications for the Western States Trucking Association. “But now it’s affecting nearly everybody who is an independent contractor.
About 17,000 truckers are registered to bring goods into the Los Angeles and Long Beach ports. Many of those are contractors who own or lease their trucks and don’t receive workers’ compensation or other benefits enjoyed by full-time employees.
“Most trucking companies are very fearful,” Rajkovacz said. “People are looking for what they can do that is bulletproof.”
For decades, unions and labor activists have accused port trucking companies of illegally using independent contractors to avoid paying costly benefits and to lighten their liabilities. But the practice has been standard since trucking industry deregulation in the 1980s despite years of strikes by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and a volley of legal actions.
The union’s argument got a boost last year when the California Supreme Court set out rules for what constitutes a company employee in the case of a delivery truck driver working for Dynamex Operations West Inc.
The court ruling laid out a standard that would make employees out of many truckers who own or lease their big rigs. It also laid the path for AB5, which largely codifies the ruling.
AB5 takes direct aim at ride-share services Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc., which used armies of freelancers to fuel their growth. While the regulation excludes some professions, such as doctors, lawyers and most hairstylists, many nontech workers will be subject to the rules.
But that doesn’t mean all employers will make a switch at the beginning of the year. Meanwhile, it opens the door for unions.
“You can’t organize independent contractors. This makes it easier to talk to them,” said Shane Gusman, legislative director for California Teamsters Public Affairs Council. “These guys are all misclassifying their drivers, whether it was the previous law or the new law until drivers are classified as employees.”
Gusman said the union will continue to challenge drivers’ status as contractors.
But many in the transportation industry are waiting to see how the rules play out, said Weston LaBar, head of the Harbor Trucking Association, a trade group that represents the transportation business at the port.
Uber has said it plans to challenge the regulations with a 2020 ballot initiative. And the California Trucking Association, which filed a suit last year alleging the ruling preempts federal law that regulates interstate commerce, also expects to file a lawsuit.
“It creates a massive amount of uncertainty in the industry,” LaBar said. “You are already seeing shippers making alternative arrangements in terms of importing and exporting of their cargo.”
LaBar said he’s advising members to seek legal counsel before deciding how to classify workers. Unlike other industries, many in the trucking world believe drivers of federally regulated interstate cargo are exempt.
A recent U.S. Department of Labor survey found that employee benefits added about 31% to the cost of payroll.
The new rule will hurt many companies, said Patrick Wilson, president of logistics firm Fast Lane Transportation Inc. “It’s going to stifle employment creation,” he said. “A lot of truck drivers got their start this way.”
Wilson employs about 100 people and contracts even more truck drivers. He said he started out as an independent contractor 40 years ago. Now he’s on the opposite side of the relationship as president of the Wilmington-based company.
Rajkovacz from the Western States Trucking Association sees a fork in the road ahead. “Ultimately there are two things that will resolve this,” he said. “It will be in federal court, or this actually ends up as a ballot initiative.”
For reprint and licensing requests for this article, CLICK HERE.
Stories You May Also Be Interested In
- Port Truckers Turn to Courts
- Trucker Classification Fight Proves Costly Battle
- Pier Pressure
- Trade & Retail: Ports grapple with changes from trade war and AB5
- Port Truck Battle Drives Off Costco
- Trucking Firms Suspect Amnesty Won’t Deliver
- Gig Law Could Hit Truckers
- Court Says Port Truckers Can Maintain Independence