Homebuilders in Santa Monica are about to be seeing green – in more ways than one.
A law that went into effect May 1 requires all new single-family construction in the city to be zero net energy, making Santa Monica the first city in the country to enact such a measure.
Practically speaking, houses in the city must produce as much energy through renewable resources as they consume in one year. Such a mandate requires designing a property in an energy-efficient manner that limits usage of heating and cooling systems as well as installing energy-efficient appliances, according to industry experts.
Such features can be costly. Mandates, droughts, and consumer desire have helped boost the growth of green building in the state, which has been good news for vendors that supply the expertise, materials, technology, and corresponding services that help developers comply with the law and their own goals to create sustainable properties.
Whether those costs will pay off for homeowners is a different story.
For example, solar panels would have to be added to new homes in order to meet the rules established by the city of Santa Monica, said J.R. DeShazo, director of UCLA’s Luskin Center for Innovation. Equipping a new house with panels costs between $8,000 to $12,000 on average when factoring in tax credits and rebates, he said, estimating it would take six to nine years for homeowners to recoup their investment in the form of lower energy bills.
Architect James Meyer, principal of downtown L.A. design and construction services firm Lean Arch Inc., said he’s seen more demand for sustainable design components in new construction projects.
“Clients will pay a little bit of a premium to have an architect or design firm that is willing to look at alternative (environmental) ideas and things to bring to the project,” he said. “A lot of times that translates to cost savings down the road.”
Demand for sustainable features is expected to grow. California implemented the nation’s first mandatory green building code, the California Green Building Standards Code, in 2010. It is updated every three years, with tougher requirements that limit waste and the consumption of electricity, water, and gas. The state Public Utilities Commission adopted a strategic plan for all new residential construction in 2008, requiring that new houses be zero net energy by 2020 and all new commercial construction to achieve the same by 2030.
That directly benefits businesses such as Sherman Oaks’ EZ Energy Solutions, which installs solar panels, systems for gray-water recycling, and energy-efficient air-conditioning and heating units. Managing Director Robert Taylor said the company has seen huge demand in the last three or four years, especially as power companies have raised electricity bills and people have become more conscientious about the environment.
The inclusion of green design features such as solar panel hookups and a water recycling system helped Burbank’s Gangi Development receive approval on a 28-townhome project from Glendale’s design review board two years ago, according to Mark Gangi, the company’s chief of design. The project, Pennsylvania Court, is preparing to break ground.
Implementing green features can be done at little extra cost in the building stage, said Jacob Atalla, vice president of sustainability for Westwood-based KB Home.
Such moves include solar panel hook-ups, energy-efficient appliances, double-pane windows, building-envelope insulation, low-flow plumbing fixtures, nontoxic paints and other coatings, and charging stations for electric vehicles.
KB Home, Atalla said, builds in large swaths across the country and is able to buy energy-efficient products in bulk and leverage economies of scale.
Gangi, however, noted that state green building mandates still have gaps.
While Europe has a system in place to monitor how occupants comply with zero-net-energy requirements, Gangi said the United States does not, making it difficult to enforce.
“True net-zero buildings will be monitored postconstruction to assure the occupants are operating the building properly,” he said. “This is how Europe operates. … In the U.S., we only review the design data, not the postoccupancy data.”
The architect also raised concerns about how zero-net-energy requirements could exacerbate the housing crisis.
“My fear is that cities like Santa Monica could abuse these ideas to restrict or eliminate new development, as they have abused the (California Environmental Quality Act) process,” Gangi said.
For reprint and licensing requests for this article, CLICK HERE.
Stories You May Also Be Interested In
- Who's Building L.A. (September 24): Los Angeles Can Thrive with Living Buildings
- 'Greenest Decision You Can Make Is Not to Tear Down'
- Green Building Movement Ready for Its Day in the Sun
- Making It Happen: Profiles
- Understanding the LEED Rating System
- THE GREEN REVOLUTION
- GREEN REVOLUTION
- Commercial Real Estate Awards 2018: Best Sustainable Project