We are at a pivotal moment in Los Angeles. Public education reform is top-of-mind across the region, and the momentum for dramatic change is palpable. We are tackling head-on the reality that our public schools are not adequately preparing our youth for 21st century jobs, a fatal flaw in L.A.'s potential ascendance as one of the world's great cities.
We are in the process of completing the largest public works project in world history, spending $19 billion to build 160 new public schools and relieve overcrowding after decades of neglect. But we look inside our schools and see that half our fourth graders aren't reading at grade level, and somewhere between 30-50 percent of our high school students are dropping out. We know it's time for massive reforms, no less epic than our school-building campaign, but infinitely more complex and demanding of community dialogue.
The choice may not be between mayoral control or the status quo , it's probably somewhere in between, and it's definitely too soon to tell. Some fundamental questions need to be addressed before a decision is made. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's passion for reforming our schools should inspire an authentic, intellectually honest discussion about Los Angeles Unified School District. But we've learned from other cities that in order for us to succeed, the mayor alone should not drive the debate. Change led from outside the educational bureaucracy has worked, but only when it's a broad, consensus-driven coalition.
The L.A. Area Chamber is profoundly committed to strengthening L.A.'s workforce. The chamber and affiliate UNITE-LA serve over 30,000 students each year through financial aid workshops, job shadowing, internship programs and more. On the policy front, we study best practices in education, leading delegations of educators to see reforms at work in other cities, and we advocate for change at all levels of government. Just last week, we were successful in lobbying LAUSD to restructure two failing and two newly built L.A. high schools into small learning communities.
The chamber believes it is time for a formal community agreement, or "compact," in L.A. to define our education goals. We are committed to making this compact work. Modeled on an extraordinary initiative in Boston, this agreement will ensure a constructive debate that won't be driven by insiders, or by Sacramento or Washington, D.C. It will be driven by Angelenos, pledging to an action agenda that includes setting goals high, measuring those goals and holding all of us accountable.
For reprint and licensing requests for this article, CLICK HERE.
Stories You May Also Be Interested In
- Business Community Cautious On Villaraigosa's Takeover Plan
- The Mayor and Education
- Time to Dig ‘Deeper’
- Uneducated Labor Posing Challenge For L.A. Business
- Hahn and Villaraigosa Trade Jabs in First Head-to-Head Mayoral Debate
- UPDATE: Chamber Endorses School Plan
- CANDIDATES---Not Business as Usual
- VICA Opposes LAUSD Compromise